The revelation that the Presidential Secretariat former President Ranil Wickremesinghe had maintained, on public dime, with nearly 107 vehicles, many of them luxury cars and SUVs to provide transport for the Secretariat’s staff and the private staff of the President, has triggered an outpouring of public anger. The 107 Vehicles are now lined up outside the Secretariat and are said to be made available for other state agencies which run essential services, who are in need of transport asserts for their duties.

While the public anguish is justified, this is an occurrence Sri Lanka has seen time and again. During each change of regime, post elections, Sri Lankans are shown such extravagance use or misuse of State resources. It is clear that such situations are the product of Sri Lanka’s decaying political culture, and a byproduct of the Executive Presidency which has reigned since 1977. Such extravagance in using State resources also points to poor policy priorities of successive Sri Lankan governments. An effective transport system is fundamental for the stability and growth of a country. However, despite calls for a ‘system change’ or radical change in the lead up to the Presidential Election, it was disappointing to note that the long-felt need to revitalise and capacity build the public transport sector was neglected by the leading candidates in the policy documents.

Sri Lanka’s public transport system has long been neglected. There has been much criticism about it and several missed opportunities. With an economy struggling to regain its footing and with the urgency of economic growth and export earning now clearly in the headlights, the potential benefits of a modern and efficient public transport network have never been more crucial. Investing in public transport is not merely an infrastructural upgrade; it is a strategic move towards economic growth, environmental sustainability, and social equity. If the Government can build investor confidence and come up with a business model that benefits the commuter, motorist and logistician, and the investor/management of the infrastructure, Sri Lanka could thrive with better internal connectivity.

Currently, Sri Lanka’s public transport relies heavily on an ageing fleet of buses and an underfunded railway system. These modes of transport, while serving millions daily, fall short in reliability, comfort, and efficiency. The buses are often overcrowded, poorly maintained, and irregular, making daily commutes a daunting task for many. The railway system, though extensive, is inadequate in terms of scale and services, suffers from frequent delays and outdated infrastructure. This state of affairs not only inconveniences commuters but also discourages the use of public transport, leading to increased reliance on private vehicles and exacerbating urban congestion. The heavy reliance on private vehicles also inflates Sri Lanka’s energy needs, with its annual fuel bill becoming a significant chuck of the State expenditure. A better transport system would also improve Sri Lanka’s productivity and efficiency of labour, both which will help the economy grow. A modern, effective and adaptable public transport system, both urban and intercity will do Sri Lanka well.

One of the most glaring examples of missed potential is the cancellation of the Light Rail Transit (LRT) project in Colombo. The LRT was envisioned as a solution to the city’s crippling traffic congestion, promising a modern, efficient, and reliable alternative to the current transport options. Singapore, renowned for its world-class public transport, attracts significant foreign investment and tourists, contributing substantially to its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For Sri Lanka, improving public transport could enhance its attractiveness as a business and tourist destination, providing a much-needed boost to the economy.

While the environmental impact of improving public transport is evident it also greatly improves social equity. A reliable and affordable public transport system provides mobility to all segments of the population, including those who cannot afford private vehicles. This enhances access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, thereby contributing to social inclusivity and reducing economic disparities. For Sri Lanka, the path forward involves several strategic steps. Firstly, the Government needs to prioritise and allocate sufficient funds for the modernisation of the existing bus and railway systems. Investing in newer, more comfortable buses and upgrading railway infrastructure to reduce delays and increase efficiency are essential steps. Secondly, reviving and expanding projects like the LRT should be a priority. Learning from the success stories of cities like Singapore and Tokyo, Colombo can develop a comprehensive urban transport plan that integrates various modes of transport, ensuring seamless connectivity and convenience for commuters.