Discussion at length took place for necessary legal amendments to regulate the Inland Revenue Department (IRD), Sri Lanka Customs and Excise Department during the recent meeting held in Parliament chaired by the Minister of Justice, Prisons Affairs and Constitutional Reforms Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, to obtain ideas for the legal amendments to be made in order to increase the state revenue. 

Accordingly, Parliamentarian Mahindananda Aluthgamage, Chair of the Sectoral Oversight Committee on National Economic and Physical Plans, explained that the IRD had been brought before the Sectoral Oversight Committee on several occasions and stated that there were a number of issues identified. 

The Chair further explained that any person can stay for 15 years without paying taxes. The Inland Revenue Department has 30 months under the existing Act to assess a tax file and another 24 months to consider appeals. Accordingly, a tax file remains in the Inland Revenue Department for more than 54 months post-appealing to the Tax Appeals Commission, they receive 2 years according to the Act, he explained. Thereafter, appeals can be made to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court and it will consume approximately 15 years, he said.

The officials of the IRD addressing the meeting stated that the arrears tax revenue due on 30 June 2023 is Rs. 943 billion and the amount cannot be recovered due to various reasons is Rs. 767 billion and the recoverable amount is Rs. 175 billion. Moreover, the officials further explained that Rs. 37 billion have been collected as tax arrears this year.

Once the tax report is received by the Inland Revenue Department on or before the 30 November every year, the officials who explained the process pointed out that after receiving the tax report, the relevant officer will enter the information into the RAMIS system and identify cases where there are problems and then an audit will be conducted, and that in some cases further information will be brought to make some clarifications. The officials also pointed out that in cases where such information is requested, often the tax holders deliberately delay the information.

The officials pointed out that the existing Act has 30 months for the tax report to be audited by the officer and after that there is another two years to hear the appeal after appealing to the Commissioner General. The Committee was of the view that the current period of two years for the Commissioner to hear appeals is too long and it is desirable to reduce it to six months. 

However, if the decision is not given within 6 months, it should be assumed that the assessment amount will not change, the Minister of Justice said. Therefore, it was suggested that the Act should be amended to require that taxpayers should pay at least 50% of the assessed amount if they appeal to the Tax Commission.

The powers of the Tax Appeals Commission were also discussed in the Committee. Accordingly, the attention of the Committee was focused on making some amendments to the Tax Appeals Commission Act. 

Currently, the Tax Appeals Commission has 270 days to hear an appeal and the Minister pointed out the need to give some time frame for that. The Committee decided that the Tax Appeals Commission should consider only the existing questions about the assessment amount or calculations and if there is any objection to the basic issues, then the necessary amendment to the Act should be brought for appeal to the Court of Appeal.

The Committee was of the opinion that it is appropriate to reduce the 30-month period to one year for the assessment of the Act. After a long discussion, the Committee decided to keep the 30 months as it is, but it is appropriate to give the necessary power to the Minister of Finance to change the period through the Gazette in cases where necessary.