The questionable ‘Dr.’ title of Sri Lanka’s former Speaker of the Parliament Asoka Sapumal Ranwala, has reignited discussions about the educational and professional qualifications of Members of Parliament (MPs) and the integrity of public representatives elected through the most recent Parliamentary Election. In the context of the controversy surrounding his fake ‘Dr.’ title, which was publicly displayed as his title during the Parliamentary Election, the legitimacy of titles like ‘Dr.’ and ‘Prof.’ held by some other MPs are now being questioned by the public.

The educational and professional qualifications of Opposition MP Namal Rajapaksa and of Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa also attracted the Parliament’s attention this week. It was also emphasised in the Parliament that this issue raises critical questions about the integrity of those elected to represent the public and highlights the importance of transparency in public office.

Thus far, the discourse on MPs’ educational qualification was largely limited to MPs not having adequate educational or professional qualifications to take decisions that impact the country. However, now this discussion is also about MPs presenting qualifications and titles that they do not have, or ignoring the misleading use of such to promote themselves. Although the most recent discussion began with Ranwala, it is now a topic of discussion among all MPs. The present National People’s Power Government is in the spotlight with other parties demanding that the Government reveal the ruling party MPs’ true qualifications.

As a Government that came to power with slogans about anti-corruption efforts, transparency, and establishing the rule of law, the Government has a vast responsibility to address these concerns. First, it should ensure that its own members have revealed or will reveal their true educational and other qualifications. Instead of pointing fingers at the Parliament’s media unit that handles MPs’ profiles for fake ‘Dr.’ or ‘Prof.’ titles, the Government should deal with its MPs to ensure transparency.

However, this is not something that only the Government or regulations can do. In a context where there are no laws requiring MPs to publicise their educational or professional qualifications, let alone possess them, this process will have to be a voluntary one based on each MP’s willingness to be honest before the Parliament and the country. Regardless of his intentions, Premadasa, whose educational qualifications were also questioned during the recent discourse, has come forward to publicly declare his qualifications. It is a commendable act because it not only allows concerned parties to check the veracity of his claims about his qualifications, but it also sets a good precedent for other MPs.

At the same time, honesty in declaring educational qualifications and titles is crucial for maintaining the trust of the electorate. It is particularly important to the present Government, who promised to be truthful and not hide information of public interest from the public.

This situation boils down to a matter of public trust in the Government. The MPs should understand that public representatives have a duty to present themselves with authenticity and transparency, not just in their actions but also in their credentials. When politicians present themselves with inflated or false qualifications, it undermines the democratic process by misleading voters about their competence and expertise. It is not just about what degree or title one holds, but also about from where it was obtained. Institutions that grant qualifications vary widely in terms of their credibility, and it is essential for the public to have full knowledge of this context. This honesty promotes accountability, and ensures that voters can make informed decisions based on the true capabilities of their representatives.

This should not worry MPs, because, at the end of the day, politicians are elected not just for their academic achievements, but also for their ability to serve and make sound decisions for the welfare of the public. It is therefore crucial not to conflate qualifications with competence, and voters should focus on candidates’ track record, values, and the ability to connect with the issues faced by the country.

Ultimately, the integrity of MPs is built on a foundation of honesty and transparency, and it is something that the public have been demanding for a long time.