SL supports Nicaragua, Belarus and Eritrea
Sri Lanka, at the ongoing United Nations Human Rights Council’s (UNHRC) 46th Session in Geneva, had made statements in support of Nicaragua and Belarus despite concerns raised by the UNHRC High Commissioner on the human rights situation in the two countries. In its official statement on “Enhanced Interactive Dialogue on the High Commissioner’s Report on the Human Rights situation in Nicaragua”, the Sri Lankan mission had noted: “We note the commitment stated by the Government of Nicaragua to respect and promote the human rights of the Nicaraguan people. “Sri Lanka is of the view that any action aimed at the protection and promotion of human rights in a country must have the consent of the country concerned and be based on the principles of co-operation and genuine dialogue. This Council should not be politicised and used as a mechanism to attack governments. “We reiterate that the discriminatory practice of selective country-specific initiatives breaches the principles of universality, impartiality, and non-selectivity stipulated in GA (General Assembly) Resolution 60/251 and the IB package. “In this context, we believe that the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is the appropriate mechanism to address the human rights situation of all countries in a uniform, objective, and constructive manner. “In conclusion, we call on the members of this Council to recognise the action taken and the public policies implemented over the years and engage in a positive dialogue with the Government of Nicaragua.” Meanwhile, in the matter of the “Report of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Situation of human rights in Belarus in the run-up to the presidential election and its aftermath”, Sri Lanka officially responded saying: “We note the co-operation and engagement by the Government of Belarus with UN human rights mechanisms, including by regular submission of reports to human rights treaty bodies, extending invitations to Special Procedure Mandate Holders and support for the UPR process. “We reiterate our concern over the continuing discriminatory practice of selective adoption of country-specific resolutions in the Human Rights Council, which breaches the principles of universality, impartiality, and non-selectivity stipulated in GA Resolution 60/251 and the IB package. “Sri Lanka is of the view that country-specific initiatives are confrontational, counterproductive, and violate the principles of sovereign equality and non-interference enshrined in the UN Charter, thereby undermining the spirit co-operation required in promoting and protecting human rights. “Sri Lanka reiterates that any action aimed at protection and promotion of human rights in a country must have the consent of the country concerned and be based on the principles of co-operation and genuine dialogue. “In this context, we believe that the Universal Periodic Review is the appropriate mechanism to address the human rights situation of all countries in a uniform, objective, and constructive engagement where countries could meaningfully and effectively contribute to the promotion and protection of human rights without discrimination. “In conclusion, we encourage this Council to engage in a positive dialogue with the Government of Belarus.” Speaking during the dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Eritrea, the Sri Lankan envoy expressed concern over continued discrimination by the UNHRC shown through country-specific initiatives. The envoy noted that such action was counterproductive and confrontational. The Sri Lankan envoy, after noting that any action to protect human rights in a country should have the consent of the respective country, called on the UNHRC to engage in a positive dialogue with Eritrea.Supporting China
Sri Lanka is in the process of further strengthening ties with ally China with a visible increase in bilateral engagements. Foreign Ministry Secretary Prof. Jayanath Colombage had recently gone on record in the Chinese media dismissing allegations of genocide committed against the Uighur community in China. Colombage had noted that there is no evidence to support claims by some western politicians that “genocide” was committed against the Uighur community in China’s Xinjiang. In a recent interview with Xinhua, Colombage, who had visited Xinjiang in 2019, had noted that not a single terrorist attack had been carried out in Xinjiang over the past several years. “I think that itself is a great achievement. And also, that talk about genocide, I don't think I have seen any evidence to suggest this because genocide is a very strong word,” Colombage had said. The official recalled visiting several sites in Urumqi and Kashgar and holding chats with the local people. “One thing I have seen in their eyes is that they have hope,” he had said. “That is something very important for a country, for a region, not to lose hope, because I was told by some of these young people, that during the time of trouble, they did not have hope,” he had added.